 |
| USA
Senator Alfonse D’Amato is the principal protagonist behind the new
Bill that is not proving too poular in Brussels |
|
Controversy
over the definition of what constitutes a wines identity: the
name of the vine or
the name of the vineyard area
?
In terms of the
economic viewpoint and relations between countries in the developed world
this may have some serious implications. Some agreements may be jeopardised
due to the differences in opinion regarding what it is that detrmines
the classification of a wine.
|
| In
Europe the area or zone that the wine comes from has extreme importance.
Indeed, the wine has as its brand name the intrinsic relation from the land
that it hails from in most cases. The Americans, on the other hand,
behave differently: the wine should be classified according to its viticulture.
So that even the name Madeira can be used as representation of the viticulture.
|
| Some
critics consider this means of classification a bit ironic - after all,
to follow the idea that the Senator proposes, he should still not be able
to call the Californian version of the wines Madeira either. That is because
the viticultural identity may be Malvasia, Boal, or Sercial, and not Madeira
as itself ! But the Senator prepared himself for this counter argument.
The wines should also be classified according to the origin of the vine.
Since the vines planted in California are originally from Madeira Island... |
| [
Continued ] |
